Introduction

Every true roadgeek cares about route numbers; is not completely satisfied with how the state DOT (or AASHTO) has numbered highways; and thinks he or she (usually he) can do a better job. Here's one of my plans for Connecticut.

If I worked in the DOT, I wouldn't actually propose this: the costs (drafting new maps, posting new signs, printing new ads, etc) for the state, businesses and residents would outweigh the benefits (a cooler numbering system). So this is just for fun.

I gave myself one constraint in this plan: no highways could be rerouted, added, deleted, or combined. All highways would stay intact except for a new number. And, signed numbers had to stay below 399. I don't address "secret routes" here, because they're not signed.

There were several reasons I had for changing numbers, and they're mentioned in the table.

"Area" does not restrict anything to a portion of a route; it merely helps you locate the route being renumbered.

Old Number New Number Reasons Area
341 42 C,D Kent
272 49 D,C Norfolk
58 51 D Redding
109 60 D,C Litchfield
42 62 T,C Cheshire
229 75 C Southington
74 86 C Vernon
207 88 C,D Baltic
169 93 C Pomfret
101 18 T,D Putnam
100 101 D E. Haven
243 102 C,D Woodbridge
127 105 T,C Trumbull
49 119 T,C N. Stonington
112 126 C Canaan
126 127 D Canaan
104 135 C,D Stamford
354 141 C,D Colchester
196 143 T,C East Hampton
155 154 D Middletown
154 155 D Middletown
102 158 T Ridgefield
165 164 D Preston
164 165 D Preston
175 176 D Newington
176 175 D Newington
287 172 C,D Wethersfield
305 186 D,C Windsor
140 192 C Ellington
319 194 C,D Stafford
171 196 D Woodstock
198 197 D Woodstock
197 198 D Woodstock
320 199 C,D Ashford
192 221 D,C Enfield
186 223 D,C Somers
286 225 D,C Ellington
194 227 C,D South Windsor
75 259 T,3 Windsor
172 267 D,T,3 Southbury
199 367 T,3 Roxbury